Religion are in the media today and in

Religion is one of the main factors that are in the media
today and in the following essay I am going to discuss to what extent the media
controls the perception of the three Abrahamic religions: Islam, Judaism and
Christianity. The reason why I decided to focus on these religions rather than
the five main ones is because it is these three religions that are talked about
the most in the media to day weather it would be to criticise them or link them
to a specific event. Also I will be discussing if certain news outlets such as
the Telegraph favour a certain religion when releasing an issue about a worldwide
event.

Islam is the second biggest religion and is the quickest
developing confidence on the planet having more than one billion adherents worldwide.
Despite the fact the Muslims make up just 4% of the population in the U.K,
since the 9/11 and 7/7 terrorist attacks, ‘Islamophobia’ has turned into an
across the board belief system that has been embraced by numerous Westerners
seemingly in view of the media scope. Islamophobia in short can be described as
an ‘ideologically grounded animosity towards Muslims.’ it is the fear of
Muslims for various reasons which are from an extreme, speculative and negative
stereotype associated with Islam and its followers. These allegations include being
crude, sexist, violent, pro-terrorism as well as being a threat to both the conventional
‘Western’ lifestyles, and traditional European and American world dominance.
Islam may be viewed as a potential force that can jeopardise the current status
of some countries and allowing it to thrive as it is arguably too much of a
risk for these world powers.

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!


order now

The quantity of Islamophobic assaults increment whenever
Islam is a current topic in the media, particularly in connection to terrorist
events. For instance, the assaults increased a year ago following the tenth
commemoration of the 9/11 assaults. The implied link between terrorism and
Islam constantly presented in the media is complimented with statistics but
fails to address the minuscule proportion of muslims that actually partake or
even slightly agree with the violence of the few. There is without a doubt an
anti-terrorist atmosphere within the majority of the population at all times
however, this is amplified and heightened when the media extend the portrayal
of the negativity associated with previous terrorist attacks or play on people’s
emotions during the immediate impact of a new attack. However, I don’t think
this is just the case for the religion of Islam, because as soon as the media
wants to shed light on any religious event weather it be from the religion of
Christianity or Islam, followers want to automatically believe or act upon what
they hear or see in the media. Therefore, I think the media has a huge
influence on the perception on peoples view on religion.

Various articles have been created signifying the abundances
of Shariah law in some Muslim-larger part nations, which seem to disregard
fundamental human rights. This, when combined with articles about Muslim
radicalism and terrorist activities, impact the view of Islam. Such finished
portrayal of uncommon occasions causes the consuming public, who cannot escape
the media’s influence, “to have an unrealistic view of Islam and its adherents.”
(refrence) Thus, numerous accept and
stress that all Muslims need to set up a curved elucidation of Shariah law as
the supreme ruling authority around the world; a framework that, despite
mainstream thinking, isn’t as strict as one may think.

Research has found that although groups such as the English
Defense League (E.D.L) and British National Party have been in charge of
various assaults, the greater number share of hostile to Muslim loathe
wrongdoings have been submitted by people un-associated with far-right parties
however roused by the consistent adverse depiction of Muslims in the media.
This draws special attention to the media, which is an instructive apparatus
for some, can fundamentally affect upon people groups convictions, states of
mind and activities. In any case, if everybody read the articles basically,
mindful that the most shocking stories get printed, such misconceptions about
Islam won’t not be as serious.

Islamic cultural dressing, particularly the burka, is
likewise respected with doubt among many. In 2007 The Daily Express distributed
‘Wearing the burka is a threat to our way of life’ in which the burka was
portrayed just like an undermining outfit and as ‘what might as well be called
the mugger’s hooded top or the outfitted burglars balaclava’, that are worn
purposely to debilitate the British lifestyle. Distributions, for example, that
said above increment negative stereotyping among Westerners.

A standout amongst the most plugged instances of open shock
was the widespread burning of Salman Rushdie’s book ‘The Satanic Verses’ which
was viewed as godless by the Muslim people group. Ayatollah Khomeini’s fatwa
requiring the death of Rushdie was likewise essentially canvassed in the media;
worsening the conviction that Islam is a religion of brutality. Notwithstanding
Khomeini’s fatwa having little impact over Britain’s fundamentally Sunni
Muslims, the media secured the fatwa with furore. Another episode which got
broad communications consideration was the production of the Danish kid’s shows
in 2005, which depicted Mohammed wearing a turban that looked like a bomb, this
too caused huge common distress and fortified convictions that Islam calls for
psychological oppression for the sake of Allah.

It is hard to give indisputable confirmation that the media
straightforwardly incites demonstrations of hostility against Muslims, yet the
expansion and sort of scope in the wake of terrorist attacks (as much as 658%
in the Sun following the 9/11 assaults) recommends that Muslims, all in all,
have been held as ‘public enemy number one’ and are aggregately in charge of
terrorist attacks. Standard Muslims dismiss these radicals; shockingly it is
this minority of fanatics – who decipher the Qur’an to suit their own purposes
– who are continually in the headlines, giving the impression to the overall
population that they represent Islam in general.

Nonetheless, with current media being a standout amongst the
most aggressive of enterprises, daily papers concentrate on the most staggering
stories in an offer to beat rivals. This pattern recommends that distortion and
ensuing fuel of Islamophobia will presumably stay for a long time to come, with
change just happening when people in general learn and comprehend the genuine
importance of religion for a Muslim, as supported and instructed in the Qur’an,
and that Islam is really an Abrahamic confidence similarly as Judaism and
Christianity may be.

These two tables were produced by Dr Chris Allen a British sociologist at the Institute of Applied
Social Studies at the University of Birmingham. They show the amount of
articles and images relating to the religion of Islam that are produced by the
main tabloids such as The Times and The Sun.

The part and impact of the media is “contentious and
debatable”

74% of the British open claim that they don’t know anything
‘or beside nothing about Islam’

64% of the British open claim that what they do know is
‘procured through the media’ Research from 2006 proposes that the press scope
identifying with Muslims and Islam in English national daily papers had
expanded by roughly 270% over going before decade

91% of that scope was considered negative

84% of press coverage represented Islam and Muslims either
as ‘prone to cause harm or risk’ or as ‘operating in a time of intense
difficulty or danger’

Research that I have done shows the consequences of negative
media coverage about Islam is :

Liable to incite and increment sentiments of
frailty, doubt and nervousness among non-Muslims;
Liable to incite sentiments of weakness,
helplessness and estrangement among Muslims, and along these lines to
debilitate the Government’s measures to lessen and counteract fanaticism;

 

Unlikely to help reduce levels of loathe
wrongdoing and demonstrations of unlawful separation by non-Muslims against
Muslims;

 

Likely to be a noteworthy hindrance keeping the
accomplishment of the Government’s people group union arrangements and
projects;

 

Unlikely to add to educated exchange and verbal
confrontation among Muslims and non-Muslims about methods for cooperating to
keep up and create Britain as a multicultural, multi-confidence popular
government.

Author:

x

Hi!
I'm Eileen!

Would you like to get a custom essay? How about receiving a customized one?

Check it out